Snapshot
SummaryCommunity Health Educator Referral Liaisons (CHERLs) help patients reduce risky health behaviors (drinking, smoking, and physical inactivity) by linking them with community resources, offering counseling and encouragement over the telephone, and providing feedback to referring physicians. The program resulted in improvements in body mass index (BMI) and self-reported health status, with these improvements being largely the result of reductions in risky health behaviors.
Moderate: The evidence consists of before-and-after implementation comparisons of key measures of health-related behaviors and health status.
| begin doxmlDeveloping OrganizationsGreat Lakes Research Into Practice Network (GRIN) The CHERL project was a joint effort of researchers from the Great Lakes Research Into Practice Network, the Michigan State University Department of Family Medicine, and Genesys Health System.
end doDate First Implemented2006 begin ppPatient Population
Geographic Location > State end pp |
|  |
Problem AddressedUnhealthy behaviors contribute to high mortality rates in the United States. Those who engage in risky behaviors typically receive limited (if any) behavioral counseling services from physicians. Patients who are referred to external counseling often do not pursue these services.
- Preventable, unhealthy behaviors lead to high mortality rates: Smoking, physical inactivity, poor diet, and problem drinking account for approximately 37 percent of deaths in the United States.1
- Lack of counseling services by physicians: Primary care physicians often identify patients with unhealthy behaviors but typically provide little if any counseling services due to time constraints, lack of reimbursement, lack of available staffing, and inadequate training regarding behavioral change.2
- Failure to seek external services: Even when physicians recommend behavioral changes and external counseling services, patients often do not follow up on these recommendations.3
Description of the Innovative ActivityBetween February 2006 and July 2007, four CHERLs worked with 15 primary care practices in three Michigan communities, referring patients to community preventive health services services and offering counseling and encouragement to help patients achieve their health-related goals. (The program was discontinued after grant funding ran out.) Key elements of the program included the following:
- Referral to CHERL: Clinicians described the CHERL services to patients with one or more of four unhealthy behaviors (smoking, alcohol use at a risky level, unhealthy diet, and physical inactivity). For interested patients, clinicians completed a basic CHERL referral form and faxed it to the CHERL, who was located in a community location such as a home office.
- Initial and followup telephone contact: The initial conversation with the CHERL included data collection on the patient’s health-related behaviors, the patient’s preferences for activities (e.g., group-based activities or self-improvement activities), and the patient’s insurance coverage. Using motivational interviewing techniques, the CHERL helped the patient set goals and create a plan for behavior change. The CHERL provided services according to one of three patient tracks, as folows:
- Referral to external resources: The CHERL referred patients to community-based resources. CHERLs used an internally developed guide to identify resources including telephone counseling, self-help guides, group programs, dietitians, Web sites, exercise facilities, and Alcoholics Anonymous meetings. The CHERL made one followup call 2 weeks later to confirm that the patient contacted the resource. If not, the CHERL encouraged the patient to do so.
- Ongoing counseling: After the initial call, the CHERL called the patient three additional times at 2-week intervals, encouraging him or her to continue with positive changes and set revised goals.
- Combination of referrals and counseling: This track combined the external referrals with ongoing calls from the CHERL.
- Communication with physicians: CHERLs sent clinicians an update letter outlining the referred patient’s goals and intervention plan or indicating that the patient could not be reached after multiple attempts. For patients served, CHERLs sent physicians additional letters at 3 and 6 months providing updates on patient goals and progress.
- Followup assessment: The CHERL telephoned all participants at 3 and 6 months after program enrollment to collect follow up data related to health behaviors.
- Computerized tracking: CHERLs used a computerized support system to collect self-reported patient data and to track calls, dates of service, and clinician feedback.
- CHERL oversight and support: The project's primary investigators provided ongoing support to the CHERLs through conference calls and via email communication. The conference calls were scheduled on an as-needed basis and usually were conducted once or twice per month depending on the project timeline and the needs of the CHERLs. The CHERLs also communicated with each other bi-weekly either through e-mail or via conference call during the first 6 months of the project and monthly thereafter, allowing them to problem-solve and share experiences as well as resources.
References/Related ArticlesHoltrop JS, Dosh SA, Torres T, et al. The community health educator referral liaison (CHERL): a primary care practice role for promoting healthy behaviors. Am J Prev Med. 2008 Nov;35(5 Suppl):S365-72. [PubMed]
Contact the InnovatorJodi Summers Holtrop, PhD, CHES
Department of Family Medicine
College of Human Medicine
Michigan State University
B105 Clinical Center
East Lansing, MI 48824
Phone: (517) 884-0432
Fax: (517) 355-7700
E-mail: jodi.holtrop@hc.msu.edu
Trissa Torres, MD, MSPH, FACPM
Medical Director, Population Based Care
Genesys Health System
One Genesys Parkway
Grand Blanc, MI 48439
Phone: (810) 606-6256
Fax: (810) 606-5617
E-mail: trissa.torres@genesys.org
|
|
ResultsA pre- and post-implementation longitudinal analysis suggests that the program resulted in improvements in BMI and self-reported health status, with these improvements being largely the result of reductions in risky health behaviors. These improvements occurred across age, race, gender, and socioeconomic status.
- Improvements in BMI and health status: Among participants, improvements were achieved over a 6-month period in BMI (which fell from an average of 35.6 to 35.1) and self-reported health status (which rose from 2.9 to 3.2, with a score of "1" representing excellent health and "5" representing poor health).
- Driven by reductions in risky health behaviors: Participants improved their diet, drank and smoked less, and became more physically active, as suggested by the results below comparing behaviors at baseline to 6 months after entering the program:
- Better diet: Self-reported diet score (using a 7-question instrument) fell from 12.8 to 11.3, with lower figures representing a better diet (a score of 7 represents the best diet, while 21 is the worst).
- Less smoking and drinking: The percent of participants who smoked fell from 30.9 to 25.6 percent, while the average number of drinks per occasion in the past month fell from 1 to 0.9.
- More physical activity: The median number of minutes per week engaged in physical activity rose from 150 to 180. The average number of days in the past month that participants were not able to complete their normal activities because of mental or physical dysfunction fell from 4.8 to 3.5.
Moderate: The evidence consists of before-and-after implementation comparisons of key measures of health-related behaviors and health status.
|
|
Context of the InnovationThe CHERL study was 1 of 10 that were included in the Prescription for Health Initiative, a 5-year collaboration between the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation and the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ). Great Lakes Research Into Practice Network (GRIN), a practice–based research network that participated in the study, includes approximately 300 primary care practices in Michigan. Fifteen of these practices participated in the CHERL study, including three hospital-owned family practices in Marquette, six family practices (including two Federally Qualified Health Centers or FQHCs) in Grand Rapids and six family practices (including two FQHCs) in Flint. Practices ranged widely in size and patient populations served were varied in terms of income, ethnicity, race, and insurance coverage.
Planning and Development ProcessKey steps in the planning and development process included the following:
- Practice selection: GRIN invited practices to participate in the research effort. Each practice was visited by study investigators, who described the CHERL service and referral process.
- Hiring of CHERLs: Participating practices hired one CHERL with a health-related background from the local community. (A fourth part-time CHERL was later added to accommodate demand.)
- Training: CHERLs were trained in behavior change counseling and motivational interviewing. CHERLs received an initial four-day training (provided by the primary investigators) followed by 3 months of iterative training on counseling techniques. In addition, each CHERL tape-recorded several patient counseling calls over the course of the study; tapes were given to one of the investigators for review and feedback.
- Resource development: CHERLs developed community resource guides that listed available programs, costs, eligibility criteria, and insurance company reimbursement provisions.
- Referral plan development: CHERLs and representatives of the practices developed a site-specific plan to identify and refer patients.
- Brochure for patients: Study investigators developed a brochure describing the CHERL’s role that practices could share with patients.
Resources Used and Skills Needed
- Staffing: Four CHERLs worked on a part-time basis, serving three to six practices each. Each CHERL worked with between 58 and 137 enrollees. All CHERLs had earned a college degree; received additional education and/or training in health education, nursing, or dietetics; and had approximately 10 to 15 years of experience in community health care.
- Costs: The program cost $380,000, consisting primarily of CHERL salaries.
begin fsxmlFunding SourcesAgency for Healthcare Research and Quality; Robert Wood Johnson Foundation; Michigan Department of Community Health The CHERL program was funded by a $300,000 grant from Robert Wood Johnson Foundation as part of the Prescription for Health Initiative, as well as an $80,000 grant from the Michigan Department of Community Health. AHRQ provided in-kind support through the PBRN Resource Center. Although the CHERL program was discontinued when funding ran out, the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation provided a transition grant of $80,000 to fund the development and packaging of a CHERL Technical Assistance Center; this center will, among other things, develop an implementation guide and training program that can be used by would-be adopters.
end fsTools and Other ResourcesThe CHERL Technical Assistance Center is developing an implementation guide and training program; interested readers can contact Trissa Torres, MD, for an update on when these resources will be available at (810) 606-6256, trissa.torres@genesys.org.
|
|
Getting Started with This Innovation
- Obtain resources: Pursue a variety of resources, including grant funding.
- Consider on-site location of CHERLs: While convenient and low-cost, telephone-based outreach and counseling may create a sense of “disconnect” between the patient and the CHERL. Consider locating the CHERL in the practice so that he/she can meet with patients face-to-face, at least for the initial meeting.
- Ensure adequate CHERL training in dealing with depression: Many patients who need to make a behavior change also suffer from depression. Combining mental health counseling and behavior change counseling may help CHERLs in working with patients.
- Take a broad view of the resource guide: The resource guide should include resources that may seem tangential to behavior change (but are really basic underpinnings for it), including mental health services, food pantries, and financial assistance programs.
Sustaining This Innovation
- Update the resource guide: Because community resources are constantly changing, the resource guide should be updated periodically.
- Approach insurers about reimbursing for CHERL services: Some insurance companies may be willing to provide reimbursement for these types of services.
Use By Other OrganizationsSeveral communities are implementing projects based on the principles and learnings that evolved from the CHERL project.
|
|
Comment on this innovation/Read other comments.
| Disclaimer: The inclusion of an innovation in the Innovations Exchange does not constitute or imply an endorsement by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, or Westat of the innovation or of the submitter or developer of the innovation. Read more. |
|
1 Mokdad AH, Marks JS, Stroup DF, et al. Actual causes of death in the United States, 2000. JAMA. 2004 Mar 10;291(10):1238-45. [PubMed] 2 Holtrop JS, Dosh SA, Torres T, et al. The community health educator referral liaison (CHERL): a primary care practice role for promoting healthy behaviors. Am J Prev Med. 2008 Nov;35(5 Suppl):S365-72. [PubMed] 3 Glasgow RE, Ory MG, Klesges LM, et al. Practical and relevant self-report measures of patient health behaviors for primary care research. Ann Fam Med. 2005 Jan-Feb;3(1):73-81. [PubMed] |
|
|
Original publication: December 10, 2008.
Last updated: September 16, 2009.
|
 |
Associated Profiles:
Automated Clinician Prompts and Referrals Facilitate Access to Counseling Services, Leading to Positive Behavior Changes Among Patients
(12/8/08)
Community Coalition Connects Medical Practices to Community Resources, Leading to Improved Asthma and Diabetes Outcomes in At-Risk Populations
(12/8/08)
|